The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

Against Reesar VllTINI}; Fllfl, EEMBLE‘ lSt. Mr. Reese: is the N0- minee of George. Brown, and the Clear Grits who voted against the separation of York' and, Peel from Toronto for j;u- dicial purposes, thus. giving the City the power to rob. us of thousands of dollars yearly. Therefore. vote for GAMBLE, who has always voted. in favor of the separation. ' 9th. Who wrote against responsible government, and in favor of Yankee Institu- tions? David Reesor. Assee Economist, November 24th, 1859. 10th. l’Vho voted against the Legislative Councillors being elective? The Clear Grits, David Reesor supporting that vote; Mr. Gamble voting in its favor; therefore vote for the Champion of the people’s i'ightsmMr. GAMBLE. 11th. Who voted in favor of our Grand. Municipal law? Mr. Gamble. And who voted against it? George Brown. 80 don’t vote for Reesor. 12th. Who, by his culpa- ble negligence, involved the Municipal Council in ruinous law costs on the Road Ques- tion, and the School Sections ; 3rd. Mr. Reesor is in fa- vor of a Dissolution of the Union, Pure and Simple! which would ruin the Farmer. As see Economzst of January the 3rd, 1860. 7th. Who opposed a Fed- eral Union of Upper and Lower Canada .7 David Reesm; As see his. own paper, the Mark! ham Economist, of September, 1859. 8111. Who threatened Revo- Iution and Annexation ’2: David Reesor. As see Economist, December 15th, 1859. There- for, Loyal BritishSubjects, don’t vote for Reesor. 2nd. Mr. GAMBLE has al- ways voted for Representation by Population; Mr. Reesor has abandoned that measure ; therefore vote for GAMBLE. 4th. Mr. Reesor, of June, 1858, says that no Constitu- tional Changes we required, but has since changed his opi- nions, and we should not vote for a man who is given. to. change. 5th. Who disliked the To-. ronto Convention, and kept away from it, and afterwards said that George Brown sold the Country ? David Reesor ! As see Economist of Decem- ber, 1859,. 6th. Who started a paper for the express purpose of Abol- ishing Separate Schools 1’ Mr. Reesor, and yet he is now in favor of continuing them. As see David Reesor’s address. E'ASONS FOR VOTIKG AND FOR ELECTORS SUPPORT THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES} AND Davitl Reesor. As see Millie-r vs. Bowman, and Haac-ke v3. Markham Counc-ill. 13th. Who was charged by his brother CounciUOrs of taking a, false oath, andis now awai‘tymg his trial for the same ’! David? RBBSOI“ As see the- Council proceedings, August 133th, 18:61). 14(11. Who, has been bitter against Orangemen, endeavor- ing to have the institution put down by Iiaw’? David Reesor. Therefore, Ora-ngemen vote against Reesor. 630”]. Who for years em- ployed as his Toronto Corres- pondent, a blackleg butcher, who was: booted from V ictorin Square, for having his own fa- ther-in-law dug up from the grave? David Reesor. V 21%. Methodists, don’t vote for Reesor, he is. again-st the endowment of’ Victoria Col.- lege. 15th.. Who is tied hand and foot to George Brown '?â€"â€" David Reesor. Who is the independent Candidate? J. W. GAMBLE, 'l‘herefore vote for GAMBLE“ 16th. Who has served the Country for thirty years, and always kept pace with the progress of’the age? J. W. GAMBLE. 17th. Who wants us to be divided into three Provinces, with three Governors (1 David Reesor. 18th. Who takes the chair at Temperance Meetings, and at the same time takes wine himself, and treats his, friends? David Reesofir. 23111. Who for the sake of getting into office himself, has, grossly belied an honorable op- ponent"! Mr. Reesor. For in an extra, he says that Mr. Gamble bought, and Mr. Perry sold you, which is au- un- mitigated. falsehood. 2.5M}. For. all the above reasons,“ and many more- 22116. If you want- aan. able servant, vote for Gamble ; who has served you all his life, Mr. Reesor is. nothing but an ambi- tious young man, without sta- bility ; who even in. the Townv ship Council, has by his negli- gence, lost you thousands of dollars. 19th. Who is in; flavor of w-eatth and; territory being add- ed to Representation by:- Popula tion, thus giving Lower Ca- nada a larger representation than Upper Canada? David Reesorâ€"as see ()shauw Vin.- déeator’s report of the Milli- ken’s Corners meeting. 223th, Who is so fickle as not to continue in any one mind six months, as he advo~ cates no Dissolution, no Fev- deral Union, Abolition of Se- parate Schools, Annexation and Dissolution, Pure. and Simple? David Reesor has advocated; all the above. and yet he has the daring presump- tion to unjustly circulate scan- dal against Mi‘. Gamble. SHAKESPEARE hath it that, “one “that lies three-thirds, and uses a “known truth to pass a thousand “- nothings with. should be. once heard “and thrice beaten.” The senteaee came fresh to our memory on read- ing Mr. Reesor’s leading article- in the )conomist of yesterday; he therein makes the inost iabulous assertions with a view to induce the electors ol' King’s. Division to believe that Mr. Perry sold?» and Mr. Gamble bought? the Moderate interest in the approaching elec- tion. in so far as the reflecting portion of the electors are cons cerned, we consider it would be- superlluons to contradict Mr. Reta sonâ€"but there are some persons who might conclude that if not denied the assertion must be trueâ€"- we therefore. give it a most. empha- tic contradiction. That Mr. Perry has resio‘nedt, we admit ;. and he did so with the consent of his friends in order that the Moderate Party might not be divided at the pollsâ€"there was no sale, and consequently no purchase in the matter. We ask our readers to marl: well the mode by which Mr. Reese; endeavors to deceiveâ€"he first makes the foul charge against Mr. (iamble, and, then adds the suspicious words, ‘-" so says report.” Now, what will the honest electors of King’s Division say to it, when we assure them that the whole scandal is “got up" and circulated by Mr. Reesor and his friends for electioneering purposes. Reesor asserts that “ a check was drawn, it is said! for $500,” but doesaot, say by whom, or any other parti- cular, and cunniugly introduces the words “ it is said,” in order that he may temper his bold assertionâ€"â€" We are willing to admit "it is, said,” but Mr. Reesor would not serve his purpose by telling who; .1. W. GAMBLE EITY Ilflflfi THE [IIINTY George Brown says no separation : Keesor has to say the same, if you want Justice ‘-‘ said" it; and we téil hitn that he and his friends are the authors of the redieulous‘ untounded scandal, in order to serve an, cicctioneering purpose. We were present, with about a hundred of the elec- tors, when Mr. Perry resigned, on the night of Saturday last, and can, write with confidence in re- gard to the subject; we feel satis- fied that there is not a man how was present at the time that will not hear us out in sayiu,or that no- thing,r whatevcrr tuOk place upon that occasionâ€"â€"on the part of either Mr. Perry or Mr. Gan'ih,le,â€"?ineon- sistent with gentlemen of honorâ€"â€" Mr. Reesor should be carefulâ€"his anxiety to become. a great man is so intense as to cause him, to, haz- ard his reputation for truthfuiness â€"â€"and‘ his determination to injure those who stand in his way is marked. by a total disregard of which might be-given. Show that you disapprove of the art- ful dodges of Mr. Reesor- and his clique, and vote for the honest and independent can- didate, Mr. GAMBLE. ELECTGRS !_ gentlemanly courtesy. And why? 13 it because an indépendent elec- tor demanded of him, on the bust- mgs, to produce his qualification 1â€"â€" and when asked my 1118 Returning Officer to comply, he did not/‘1! THE “Editar-in-Chief” H'Wliat could be. more reasonable than to sup- pose that Mr. McDougall would do his. utmost to, secure- his brother-inâ€" law’s. rett‘trn for King’s Division.â€" Ol' course- there is no one finding fault with that, but what we do object to, and what every lover of truth and Justice will sav is Very objectionable, is wilful misreprm. sentation to serve party ends. The. Globe of Tuesday last represents, Mr. Gamble as a “seeker for a seat in the Cabinet,” and attempts to hold him up. as opposed to Re- presentation by Population. All those who have watched Mr, Gaiznble’s past course, asa politi- Gian and a statesman, canjudgerâ€" and we feel; confident that never was a more untounded insinuatiom sent forth to tarnish the fair fame of an honorable, upright man, than: that which associates John W. Gamble‘s name with “ office seekâ€" ing." He is no office seekerâ€"~â€" which Mr. hie-Dougall cannot say of himself! it To our knowledge, as regards the question of Reprm sentation, by Population, the Globe is not correct; and: we need only to give. an extract from. Mr. Gamble’s stcech at Markham Vil- lage, when the Moderate Convenâ€" tion met on the 30th June last? and thereby show the unscrupu- lousness ot the Clear. Grit organ. when he has an axe to grind! Speaking on the several public questions, Mr. Gamble said : “ The question of Representation by Popn - lntion l was always. in favor of, and I can probably what no, Upper Canadian member can em. and that is. that at the. time of the Union‘avhen ths Lower RtiUVlWCeS had the larger population, I was their in, a glorious mi I07‘ll\‘ of ten, who voted;to give the Lower Province Representation, by Population-w (Loud cheers”) In is generally: known mat Wi,l-. liam Mc~DougaU, (broiherâ€"Lm-Iaw of Mr. Reesor) is the man who dam the thunder for; U18- Globe news,- paper, under the approval of the The “Globe” vs. J. W. Gamble»- J. W Gambia. What can be more plain and straigi‘ltfmward than this quotation from Mr. Gamblc’s speech; and yet. forsnoth, Mr. McDougall would {aim make it appear that Mr. Gmable is opposed to the prmcipl‘e. in order that Mr. Reesor may have but gave him. an evasive answer. Of course the elector entered his protest against .Mr. Reesor being, a qualified candidate. and that was the proper time for the elector to. exercise his right. This should not cause Mrg Reesor to forget himself and circulate rumours to the injury of his. neighbors, for se-lfishcnds. But, what. .need we care, neo sensible man believes him. Our only motive in noticing the canard is to prevent any one mix» taking our motives. Vote for GAMBLE. a better chance of securirig: his election. It is not by coming for’ ward and asserting great. prin- ciples, and depending upon his own merits, that the Clear Grit expects to succeedâ€"41.0 ! He leaves his Opponent to assert and advo- cate principles, and he will take [rile chance m misleading the masses. of the people, by [11.8308 of a venal press. It will not succeed, andsbefmje another week rolls rouml, Messzts. McDongall, Reesnr 8: 00., will find; the truth of our pred..'i(:t1,(mu E037 REPRESENTATION BY POPULATIQN, Is, and always has been THER I‘ZFORE