The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

v Mo '¢$$9¢$$$*““‘$9$$$$¢$¢$Q$¢$$¢$$¢$¢$¢$e¢$$$¢$¢‘ Residents in London who are in- te.'estcd in their place of residence, its complicated social problems, and its. vast population, to which so many foreign nations make contribuâ€" tions, find the latest Blue llook rela- tive to last year's census a fascinatâ€" ing study. It is a most intimate document, although its tables may have a forbidding appearance. it tells of every Londoner‘s place of birth, age, occupation, and condiâ€" tion, and even records 1110 number of husbands. on the one hand, and the wives, on the other, whose spouses were absent on the night on which the return was. made, though the lieâ€" gistrar-Generaf, in noting that there were 47,310 husbands wifeless. and 63,035 wives husbandless, does not suggest that all these. cases repre- sented domestic tragedies. Nearly two hundred pages of facts for Londoners are set forth in effec- tive contrast, and he who will, may from these pages learn much of the bustling city. It is no mean city, or rather administrative county. It comprises:â€" Seventy-four thousand. eight hunâ€" dred and thirty-nine statute acres. Fiftyâ€"eight Parliamentary constitu- encies. Twenty-eight metropolitan bor- ‘ oughs, excluding. of course. the City. Fifteen petty sessional divisions. Six hundred and eleven ecclesiasti- cal parishes, in the discese of London, Rochester, or St. Albans. Four million five hundred and thir- tyâ€"six thousand five hundred and for- tyâ€"one persons, or nearly five times as many as a century ago. It may interest the curious to learn that the smallest, parish is St. Alphage, London Wall, with 29 in- habitants, while Lanibeth Palace, with its 37 residents, is in the dioâ€" cese of Canterbury, so that Dr. Temâ€" ple is still in his own ecclesiastical area when residing in London. London is not growing as rapidly as it was, because near the centre private houses are becoming shops, other residential buildings are giving place to ofilces, and the population is being driven ever outward into the more distant suburbs. - GROWTH OF GREATER LONDON. In recent years London has been most energetically pushing its borâ€" ders outward, coyering fields with bricks and mortar and transforming rural lanes into formal, well maâ€" cadamlzed roads, lined with villas. Consequently "Greater London" now ‘ includes many parishes which are still counted for local government purposes as belonging to the counâ€" ties of Surrey, Kent, Essex and Hertâ€" ford. This area of 443,419 acres, has a population of 6,581,372 per- sons, an increase of nearly a million â€"947,000, to be exactâ€"«in the preâ€" vious ten years, roughly one-third coming from within, and two-thirds from outside districts. As is pointed out:â€" "In the city of London and six of the central metropolitan boroughs the enumerated population showed an actual decline of over 67,000 in the ten years, notwithstanding that the recorded excms of births over deaths in that period amounted approxiâ€" mately to 70,000. In these central boroughs, with one exception, a deâ€" crease of population has regularly occurred during the last four interâ€" censal periods, and has been due in great measure to the. transforma- tion of dwelling houses into Ware- houses, oflices and busineSS premises. This centrifugal dispersion of town population is, however. shared by all great, old and prosperous cities.” THE SUPERABUNDANT FEMALE. On an average each of the 1,019,â€" 546 families in the county of Lon- donâ€"not. “Greater London” to which the figures do not applyâ€"number raâ€" , ther over 4.4 persons each, while the, females are shown to exceed the males by over a quarter of 9. milâ€" lion, and this disproportion is on the increase, for whereas ten years ago there were 1,116 to every 1,000 males, there are now 1,118. Exclud- ing hotels and lodging houses, these households employ 15,425 male and 234,398 female serVants. or one and a half to every hundred families of the former and twenty-three of the latter. These figures suggest that ‘ if every house were to have its proâ€" per proportion of service a painful, if not fatal, system of decimation would have to be practised. Ilampâ€" stead and Kensington give most emâ€" ployment to servants. Included in these million-odd house- holds are rather less than a similar number of children of from three to fourteen years of ageâ€"968,007, of whom 481,060 are boys. and 486,916 girls. Moreover, in spite of all the disadvantages to health of "mean streets" London is again shown not to be a bad place in which to live if one would live long. if not merâ€" rily. The number of persons seventy- five Years old and upward is 52,679 and of these 18,776 are males and 33,903 females. At. the extreme ages the excess of females is still more marked, and of those who claim to be aged one hundred years and upward nineteen are females and five males. London should be proud of its twentyâ€"four Centenarians. As to the place of births of London's millions, the ch‘istrarâ€"Cenel‘al N‘- cords:â€" Of the 4,536,541 persons enumerâ€" LthDth THE GREAT INTERESTING FACTS ABOUT THE \‘VORLD’S METROPOLIS. v$3v fl3333333333$$$$33333333$$$$$vv3333$$$$3$33$6Â¥ D f. 3%. 4’ ated in the county of London, 3,â€" 016,580 were natives of London; 35,421 were born in Wales and Mon- jmouth, being an increase of 4,129 since 1891; 56,605 in Scotland, an .increase of 3,215: 60,211 in Ireland. ‘a decrease of ,254, and 33,350 in ‘llritish Colonies or dependencies. Per- ;sons of foreign birth numbered 161,- 222, and of these 20,231 were Eritâ€" lish subjects, 5,621 were naturalized [British subjects, and 135,377 were if'oreigners, an increase in the case of ithc last named of 40,324 since 118913' HOW LONDON LIVES. These census figures suggest the cluestionzâ€"“How does London live?" And the official reply is not without interest in view of the increasing deâ€" mand for houses for the working classes, and is reassuring, since tlfem is a. decline in the huddling together of poor people in single rooms. It is stated:â€" “The total number of separate ten- ements, which had been 937,606 in 1891., rose to 1,019,546. the increase being equal to 8.7 per cent. Of this total the tenements containing five or more rooms increased from 307,â€" 037 to 347,516 equal to 13.2 per cent, while the increase of those with less than five rooms was from 630,569 to 672,030, and did not exâ€" ceed 6.6 per cent.. The rate of inâ€" crease in the larger tenements was, therefore, exactly double that shown in the smaller tenements. Stated in another way, the tenements with five or more rooms were equal to 32.7 per cent. of the total tenements in 1891 and to 34.1 per cent. at the reâ€" cent census, while the percentage of the tenements with less than five rooms declined from 67.3 to 65.9. The reduction in the number of the latter class of tenements was most strongly marked in the tenements of one room, which declined from 172,- 502 in 1891 to 149,524â€" that is, from 18.4 per cent. of the total tene- ments to 14.7 per cent. It may fur- ther be p6inteZl out that the number of single room tenements in which more than two persons were enumerâ€" ated declined from 56,622 to 40,762, while the number of oneâ€"roomed teneâ€" ments with six or more inmates on the census night declined from 4,097 to 1,802. The tenements of two rooms showed a. slight decrease and those of three and four rooms a marked increase upon the numbers re- turned in 1891." MINORS AS WIDOWS AND WIDOWâ€" ERS. The Registrarâ€"General has the sat- isfaction of recording that there were 730,062 households on the night of the census with both their heads, while he prints some interesting fig- ures as to the marriage state of Lonâ€" don's population:â€" “Of’ the males, 1,292,594 are un- married, 777,363 are married, and 72,128 are widowed. Of the females, 1,403,842 are unmarried, 793,097 are married and 197,517 are widow- ed. “The proportions of the married to the population, at all ages is now higher than it was in 1891, owing to the decrease in the proportion of children through the decline in the birth rate. The proportion of the married, however, if calculated on the population aged upward of twenâ€" ty years, is distinctly lower than it was ten years ago, both amo'ng mal- es and females. "The number of males under twen- tyâ€"one returned as married is 2,809, and the number of females 10,529. There are also twentyâ€"one widowers and seventyâ€"three widows under twenty-one years of age.” LONDON'S AFFLICTED. London has its due proportion of those who are crippled by loss of sight or hearing. Of the former there are 3,556, which marks a slight deâ€" crease since 1891, a tendency which is more marked in the case of the idcaf-and, therefore, dumbâ€"who numâ€" ber 2,057. About a quarter of the former, so great have been the strides made in the instruction of persons thus afflicted, are able to en- gage in some occupation. while half of the deaf are in a similar fortunate position. 01‘ the blind 122 were workers in willow, cane or rush, 90 were musi- cians, 76 costermongers. «19 brush or broom makers, and 45 musical in- strument makers or tuners. Of the deaf and dumb. 9-1 were tail- ors, 72 boot and shoe makers, and :71 dress makers; 55 were engaged in .laundry and washing service, All were ldomestic indoor servants and 40 bookbinders. INCREASE OI“ WOMEN WORKERS l‘etails of the methods by which the people of London IllakfFor do not makeâ€"their living are of interâ€" est. and it appears that 82.8 per cent. of the males over ten years old attempt to earn a subsistence. and no less than 38.4 of the females; in the latter case there is an increase of 1 per cent. which is hardly sur- prising in view of the invasion of the business world by women. 76.3 per cent of whom are unmarried. Some figures are givenâ€" “Of the 719,331 females over ten years of age engaged in occupations, 318.731. or 76.3 per cent, are unâ€" married. and 170,610. or 23.7 per ,cent. are married. Among the occu- ‘pations in which married or widowed females are principally engaged are laundry and washing service, with 27,204â€"01‘ whome 7,604 work ‘at home'-â€"against 20,158 unmarried; charwomen with 21,624 married, against 4,327 unmarried; dressmakâ€" ers, milliners, stayâ€"makers, s‘iirt makers. and seamstresscs with 24,- 818 marriedâ€"of whom 14,005 work ‘at home'â€"against 80.700 unmarâ€" ried,, and 11.567 tailors marriedâ€"of whom l1,5372 work ‘at. home’- against 21,517 unmarried; 2,381 girls between ion and fourteen years, and 5,876 boys of the same ages work for their livings.” v â€"â€"'__‘(‘ THE CIGARETTE . Its Use Affects Boysâ€"An Anti-Cigarette War. How "0an your mouth, my little man" said a Toronto doctor, bending over a seven-yearâ€"old patient. Thus adjured the lad obeyed, and disclosed a flabby, discolored throat with a chronically diseased look. A prolonged examination terminated in this question to the mother : “Has your boy ever smoked ? The appearances suggest nicotine poisonâ€" ing.” “No ; nothing but cigarettes." "Cigarettes !" "Yesâ€"there's no harm in them, is there ? The child is so fond of them." We need not chronicle the remarks that followed. The doctor put it strong. In the sitting room, off the bed- room, two sallow faced boys of and 14 were lounging about. The fond mother thought the doctor had better prescribe for them, too. They were also home from school with sore throats. Here again the darkenâ€" ed, inflamed tensionless tonsils told the same story. The doctor's stern words of reproof were evidently an amazement to the mother, who ex- plained that “Her children’s nerves were so unstrung (l) they seemed to need the stimulus of the cigarette. Indeed they could not get through a night without a smoke, so she al' ways left a light burning low, to ac- commodate them." You did not suppose any such silly mothers ‘7 But there are. They are not so numerous as those who account the cigarette a. low, vile thing, quite too common and vulgar to tempt their wellâ€"broughtâ€"up sensible boys, and while they rest in this fancied seâ€" curity, the well-bred boys are remptâ€" ed, secretly yield, and form the habit that ruins them. THE STREET CHILD. The street child is the readiest victim. In the recent press records of Magistrate Jeff’s court, Hamil- ton, we flnd an account of the conâ€" viction of a barâ€"tender for selling to little Tommy Toner, a lad so small he” came into court holding his fath- er’s hand, and he and the bevy of associates called as witnesses (all smokers) were said by the Herald to look like a. section of a SS. inâ€" fant class. The hotelâ€"keeper paid the barâ€"tender’s $50 fine, and that ended the matter, so far as they were conâ€" cerned. The question for the public is, what will be the end of it for the boys ? B. Broughton, M.D., physician in there were charge of opium and other drug patients, at the Leslie E. Keeley Gold Cure Co., says 2â€"â€" ‘I'More young men are led to the opium habit by cigarette smoking than by patent. and proprietary medicines. Sixty per cent of all males under forty years of age. treated at Dwight for opium, morâ€" phine, or cocaine using, in 1896, had been smokers of cigarettes, and Sixty per cent of these had no other excuse than that they needed some stimulant more than the cigarette furnished them.” THE MOTHERLAND . We shall soon have the company of our own nationality in the anti- cigarette war now waging. The Birmingham Ageâ€"Herald (Eng- land) says :â€""The British public is fighting an, invader that is almost resistless. It possesses neither heart nor conscience. It allows nothing to stand in its way. The American Tobacco Trust derives its revenue from every thin-faced child in Amâ€" erica. It draws into its swelling purse the pennies of clrlldren who suck poison out of their baleful paâ€" per rolls. They have grown fat on the corpses of immature children, poxsoned to death by the product of their factories.” ‘ From Scotland comes the news that in Dundee calculations show the weekly consumption of cigarettes not less than half a million, and that the Connnissioncr appointed by the Sunday School Chronicle has gather- ed tho evidence of the most eminent men, heads of colleges, head masters of grammar schools, employers of labor, etc., and finds it the unaniâ€" mous opinion that the "paper pipe" is a menace to intellectual, physical and moral character. The officers of the Boys’ Brigades of Dundee meditate an attempt to legislate the cigarette into oblivion. Everywhere the battle rages. As the Arkansas “Traveller” says :â€" “The antiâ€"cigarette forces show no disposition to smoke the pipe of pencef’ .5..â€" If the world is going wrong, Forget it ! Sorrow never lingers long, Forget it ! . If your neighbor bears ill-will, If your conscience won't be still, If you owe an ancient bill, Forget it I DOES FARMING PAY. We are being continually told that notwithstanding the growing pros- perity of our country. notwithstandâ€" ing our increasing wealth, labor-sav- ing‘ machinery, comforts and even luxuries there is less real enjoyment of life than there was in the days of the sickle and the hoe. the scythe and the pilcbfork. We are told, too. fh.:t notwithstanding the increased value of farm product consequent upon larger yield and better prices the ar‘tual net profit of the farm is no greater than it was fifty years ago. That there is considerable foundation for the contention we adâ€" mit, but. we are not. inclined to take it at its face value. What was real enjoyment to our forefathers might, under the conditions of to-day be abâ€" ject misery, and in arriving at the net profit of the farm toâ€"day we have many an item of comfort and luxury on the expenditure side of the acâ€" count whiih found no place there fif- ty years ago. While we cannot proâ€" perly compare any two periods of our historyâ€"st-parated by years and by changed conditions-it is quite evident that THE GOOD OLD TIMES of which we read and hear so much, while they served their day and genâ€" 12, oration well, would be extremely disâ€" tasteful to us of to-day. Condi- tions are constantly changing al- though human nature appears to present the same surface through succeeding generations. The good old days were not the cloudless days which the fond historian, looking backward through the mists of me- mory, would have us believe. He sees only the rainbowâ€"not the thunâ€" der cloud behind it; only the sunny slopes 0n the distant hillsâ€"not the frowning precipice nor the dismal swamp. There were in those (lays the same comparisons with a former better age that are made to-day, the same enjoyment of life, the same sor- row, the same heartache. Wealth and poverty, profit and loss. conâ€" tentment and discmitcnt, life and death rolled along then as now. The race was not to the swift nor the battle to the strong then any mOI‘e than it is to-day, and when the whole matter is summed up it must be admitted that man bears the same relation to his surround- ings toâ€"day that he did in any other age; that he who cannot make a profit out of living toâ€"day could not in the golden days of the forest primeval, of the sickle and the hoe or the scythe and the pitchfork. ROOTS AS PIG FEED. Popular opinion is beginning to realize the importance of feeding more succulent feeds to all sorts of domestic stock. In dairying silage has become such‘ a recognized factor that no dairy- man who is familiar_with its beneâ€" fits attempts to get along without it. Roots are generally considered raâ€" ther expensive for cattle feed. but most swine men regard them as un- equaled as a succulent feed for bogs. Silage, though exceptionally good in the dairy barn, is entirely out of place in the hogâ€"house. The great virtue in feeding roots to swine is not so much the real in- trinsic value of the mangel as a, feed for pigs, by itself, but its impor- tance in affording a, variety to the feed. Again, roots exert another strong influence over the animal, and this is in maintaining a. free and healthy condition of the whole digestive sys- tem. We have yet to meet the first exâ€" perienced swine-raiser, who was also an advocate of the root crop as a feed for pigs, who did not urge that care be exercised in not overfeeding during the winter season. The root in nature is essentially a summer feed. and if fed in abundance it also requires summer conditions. Provide warm shelters and feed suc- culence in moderation. In our observations of experiments carried along the lines of feeding roots to hogs and determining re- sults, the Drovers' Journal has not- ed two things quite invariably. viz: Firstâ€"Feeding of roots in addition to grain and other feed quite infre- quently produces a better gain than is the case where the roots are omit.â€" tcd. Secondâ€"If the addition of roots does not actually produce a gain in flesh, it prevents the possible falling behind by producing 100 pounds of flesh at a less cost of feed. Mangels serve the best when they are used as an auxiliary rather than as a staple feed, such experiments indicate that excessive use retards fattening. Experiments conducted at Ottawa. 400 pounds of mangels equal about 65 pounds of grain, or one pound of inangcls will equal 61;") pounds of grain. in Denmark it Was fou id that one pound of barley equaled from six to eight pounds of mangels. CHARCOAL FOP. POI‘ L'l'RY. Pure charcoal. or the charred wood from the stove. when fresh. is an ex- celltnt aid in arresting: bowel comâ€" : plaint. and is both simple and harm- ll here the hens have not had a jltss. purpose f Utah and Ohio stations indicate that f Accordingr to experiments conducted i variety, parched grain, partly burnt. affords an agreeable change, and serves nearly the same purpose as charcoal. Oats wheat, or even bran. will be readily eaten by hens when they have been regularly fed on a sameness of diet, and such food will greatly aid in arresting diar- rhoea or other bowel disorders. In experiments made to determine the benefits of charcoal feeding, if any, four turkeys were confined in a. pen and fed on meal. boiled potatoes and oats, and four others of the same brood were at the same time confin- cd in another pen and fed daily on the same articles, but with one pint of finely pulverized charcoal mixed with their food. These had also a plentiful supply of broken charcoal in their pen. The eight were killed, and there was a difference of one and oneâ€"half pounds each in favor of those supplied with charcoal. They were the fattest. and the meat was superior in point of tenderness and flavor. __+___ CA lt’l‘l NC A N EMPEROR. The Emperor of Austria, Francis Joseph, is a sporting individuall and as fond of a good joke as any of his subjects. A short time back he was out, for a, long walk, and at nightfall he found himself seine considerable dis- tance from the house he was staying at. Tired and weary, he trudged along, wondering how longI it would take him to get back, when he heard in the distance a peasant’s cart ap- proaching. He waited until it came up to him, and then, hailing the driver, asked if he might ride in his Cart. The yoke] bluntly answered in the affirmative. and the Emperor scrambled up by the wheel. "Do you know who I am ?" queried Francis Joseph, when in the cart. "Well, upon my word, I don’tâ€"and neither do I care,” gruflly answered the jehu. “I am the Emperor Francis eph," said his Majesty, tones. . The peasant then thought a practi- cal joke was being played on him, and replied, with magnificent indiffer- ence : "And do you knpw who I am ?" "No ; I have not that honor," an- swered the Emperor. “Well, I’m the shah said the yoke], and continued his journey, while the shaky vehicle nearly paralyzed the Emperor. His Majesty was heartily amused at the joke. J os- in Imperial of Persia," ENGLISH BOOKS. The following stand in England on literary records: The largest cir- culation of any English novel in copyright is that of “East Lynne," of which the public have bought nearly half a million. The earliest published work still in copyright is Tennyson's "Poems by Two Broth- ers," which dates from 1837. The largest amount ever given for serial rights in England is £7,000 ($35,- 000), paid by Cornhill for George Eliot’s "Romola." The largest cheque ever given to an English au- thor is £20,000 ($100,000), received by Lord Macaulay for his history. The most expensive single volume lately issued is Morris' “Chaucer,” published at £20 (8100). The thickest single volume in print is the “Catalogue of Current Literature.” which measures 101: inches across the back. The highest price given for a first edition is 545 guincas ($2,860) for an uncut copy of the Kilmarnock “Burns.” THE LONGEST WORD. "Bob," said Tom, "which is the most dangerous word to pronounce in the English language ?" “Don't know," said Tom, it's a swearing word." “Pooh !” said Tom, "it's stumbled because you are sure to get a tumble between the first and last letter." “Ha, ha !" said Rob. “Now, I’ve got one for you. I found it one day in the paper. Which is the longest word in the English language ?" "lncomprehensibility," said Tom. promptly. “No, sir ; smiles, because there's a iwhole mile between the first and last 'letter !" "H0, nothing. over three miles ning and ending.” "What's that ?” asked Rob, faint- ly. "Beleaguered," said Tom. "unless 'n "that's that has its begin- ho cried Tom, I know a word between â€"_ AS A SUGGESTION. A young married lady is often criticized by her friends because of the freedom with which she accepts little attentions from friends of the other sex. At a recent gathering which she attended she drew from her pocket IllCl' lace handkerchief, in which a knot had been tied in order to call to her mind some trivial duty. “Dear me," said the popular young llltl‘l‘lt‘fl lady to several gal- lants about her, "why is that knot .in my handkerchief ‘2 I tied it there ‘to remind me of something. What Could it be ‘2" “My child,” said an old lady, who overheard her, and who is noted for lthe acrid wittiness of her repartee, "it was probably tied in order to Viremind you that you are married." He came from his daily grind at "the oflice and, falling into a chair. said : “What have you to read ‘? I'm just in the mood for readng something sensational and startling ‘â€"solnething that will make. my hair lstnnd on end " “llcre's the "ii'l for ‘my new dresses, darling.”